If Evolution by natural processes from “amoeba” to man is possible, as Evolutionists maintain, it would undoubtedly require billions of years to accomplish. A younger universe would make Evolution impossible.
Some age estimation methods seem to indicate Earth is extremely old. Many other processes appear to indicate it is much younger.
There is no scientific method that can positively prove Earth is very old—or relatively young. Absolute proof of an old Earth would require billions of years of on-site measurements and observations.
See this page in: 英语 - English
According to Evolutionists, what is the age of the Earth and universe? 答案
OLD AGE METHODS - What evidences are used to support the idea of a multiple billions of years old Earth? 答案
RADIOACTIVE AGE ESTIMATION METHODS - Do they prove the earth is billions of years old? 答案
CARBON-14 DATING - How accurate is it? 答案
Is the Bible clear about the age of the earth and universe? 答案
How can light get to us from stars which are millions of light years away in a universe which the Bible claims is only thousands of years old? 答案
4TH DAY - Was the fourth day of creation twenty-four hours long? 答案
6TH DAY - Could all of the events recorded on the 6th day of creation really have taken place during a normal, 24-hour-type day? 答案
24-HOUR DAYS - Does the Hebrew text really refer to 24-hour periods in the Creation week? 答案
BIBLICAL IMPORTANCE - Is the age of the Earth a “trivial” doctrinal point? 答案
PROGRESSIVE CREATIONISM - Is it a viable option? 答案
THEISTIC EVOLUTION - Is it biblical? 答案
Progressive Creationism - Who is Hugh Ross and what does he teach? 答案
GAP THEORY - What is it? And is it a good theory? 答案
GAP THEORY - Is it an acceptable way to harmonize the Bible and the geologic record? 答案